Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 11
Review for Mac users October 12, 2004 Murray (West Sussex, UK) 4 out of 4 found this review helpful
Content aside - the other reviewers have covered that - I give a rather poor 3 stars for the Mac OS X implementation of this program. In look and feel, it is totally Windows - and all the tatty, un-intuitive features of Windows we Mac users are glad to be free from, including absolutely no standardisation of interface, so you have to change all your computer-use habits just to use this app. It has obviously been ported to the Mac without any concessions to how the Mac interface works - for instance, the bottom scroll arrow is lost because it is under the resize handle at the bottom right of the window. On top of this, the software runs horribly slowly in OS X Panther - Britannica admit there's a problem with this on their site. They're 'working on it', but meanwhile have of course released the 2005 version.I bought this because I wanted to usable encyclopedia. I may have got the content I want, but, on the Mac, using it is less than a pleasant experience.
For Mac Users October 8, 2004 K. Casey (Tipperary, Ireland) 2 out of 2 found this review helpful
Very comprehensive, veritable mine of information but a couple of thing of note for mac users 1) Quizmaster is PC only 2) VERY PC interface.... not at all like 'Worldbook" which comes with most new macs... and has a much friendlier interface as well as making more use of mac features and quartz.
Excellent PC-based encyclopaedia August 22, 2004 A. S. Garton (milton keynes, england) 10 out of 10 found this review helpful
Having painstakingly read through all the reviews that I could find, both of the Britannica and Encarta encyclopedias, I finally settled on this one. I am very pleased that I did.I was looking for a functional, PC-based encyclopedia that would link to the Internet and provide suitable (and safe) access to my young daughter. I was pleased that the Ultimate reference suite came with everything I needed for my wife and I, and the kids, in segregated databases within the same software. The links to the Internet work well, the user interface is as easy to use as anything else I've seen and the content is remarkable. I have two minor grumbles. The first is that all the media clips lean toward being American. When I say "American", I mean that all the sound and video clips are voiced in American - the content of the database itself certainly could not be described as American, as I have read in reviews elsewhere. In fact, I have been able to extract lots of data relating to medieval life in England, one of the reasons I bought the product. The second small grumble is that the multi-media content could be improved - considering the content and the technological platform it requires, I would like to see some more spectacular visuals than simple video clips, colour diagrams and sound. I want CGI animation! Perhaps a future version will fulfil this? In summary, this is a terrific purchase at a great price. The content, which let's face it, is why most of buy an encyclopeadia, is superb. There are good offers available for registering the product, too.
Encarta UK vs. Britannica - a second opinion July 25, 2004 Mark R. Bannister (London, England) 25 out of 26 found this review helpful
I would like to disagree with the reviewer of 19th June 2004 who concluded that "Encarta UK is excellent in all aspects but Britannica's text (USA focused) makes interesting to buy both".Having bought both - based on the previous reviewers comments - I find that I cannot recommend Encarta UK and can recommend Encyclopedia Britannica. Encarta is the encyclopedia that is in fact more USA focused, as it has more U.S. content and provides much less real information for other countries. Britannica, which doesn't have a "UK edition" but a good encyclopedia should not need country-specific editions, was published in Scotland for its first nine editions (120 years) then jointly London and New York until the 1940s. How an encyclopedia that has spent more years of its life being written in the UK, and is littered with articles that make continual comparisons with Scotland or the United Kingdom, can be called "USA-focused" eludes me. Britannica is a vast store of information, its articles are long and authoritative, and navigation through those articles is very easy. Britannica's choice of font is superb, as it really enhances the sense that you're leafing through a book that contains hundreds of years of accumulated knowledge. On the other hand, while it might be slightly easier to find information in Encarta, the articles are strewn with distractions (default font size too big, sentences double-spaced, photos that can bear little resemblance to the information you're reading) and there is no navigation at all within an article. Compare, for example, the articles on the history of the United Kingdom. Encarta presents this as a few sections covering rough highlights of some key events on one long page that you must scroll through. Britannica organises the information into sections on many pages and includes every major historical event that has ever occurred, with plenty of navigation tools for moving around the article and reading related material, with many tables and graphs of statistical data (missing from Encarta). Encarta rarely identifies the source of their information, Britannica always names the author of the article (and they are always a specialist in the subject). The only benefit I can find with Encarta is their selection of maps, and their navigation system for the maps. But I wouldn't buy Encarta just for the maps (if you want real maps, they're not detailed enough). The installation of Encarta forced me to install IE6, and required a reboot as a result, neither of which I wanted (and is a typical Microsoft strategy). Britannica does have a sluggish interface, but this might not be surprising due to the huge amount of information which it is making available to you (vastly bigger than Encarta). Britannica doesn't have so many pictures or videos, but the use of these in Encarta is distracting and rarely "on subject". It looks like Encarta has just had pictures thrown in to help market the product by claiming it "has more pictures". In conclusion, Encarta is a glossy magazine, not an encyclopedia. If you want an encyclopedia, a source of knowledge, there is only one choice - Encylopedia Britannica.
Britannica is simply the best July 6, 2004 4 out of 8 found this review helpful
I brought this DVD for family use and it has been perfect for both school projects and my oldest son who is 16. There is a huge amount of relevant and quality information which is easy to access. As my youngest daughter is 12 and I no longer feel comfortable leaving her to research on her own on the internet because of the incorrect information and viruses, pop-ups etc. The Britannica DVD means that I can leave her by herself to find the information she needs in a safe environment. The research organising tool is very handy for them to manage their projects and the images and videos are fantastic. Encyclopaedia Britannica always proves to be the best in quality and value for money.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 11
|